TPOVs @F-L-O-W

Setting the context for FLOW
 
"People without an internalized symbolic system can all too easily become captives of the media.”  -Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, 1990

In this TPOV, I'm suggesting that when and where people are spending time and investing efforts appropriate to enter and remain in FLOW, both from their own happiness design and through the design of living, working, and relationships, which are externally controlled by requirements of success, is important to consider as part of living and working well.

There are several important contributors to FLOW and the context for FLOW--one direct, and the other indirect; M. Csikszentmihalyi and E. Jaques, each of which creates serious lynchpins to consider of the quality of life and the quality of work, respectively.

Csikszentmihalyi defines flow as “a state in which people are so involved in an activity that nothing else seems to matter; the experience is so enjoyable that people will continue to do it even at great cost, for the sheer sake of doing it”.  (Csikszentmihalyi 1990, p.4)  He identifies a number of different elements involved in achieving flow:

·There are clear goals every step of the way.

·There is immediate feedback to one’s actions.

·There is a balance between challenges and skills.

·Action and awareness are merged.

·Distractions are excluded from consciousness.

·There is no worry of failure.

·Self-consciousness disappears.

·The sense of time becomes distorted.

·The activity becomes an end in itself.

"There are two main strategies we can adopt to improve the quality of life.  The first is to try making external conditions match our goals.  The second is to change how we experience external conditions to make them fit our goals better.”  - Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience, 1990

Another important starting point for setting the context for FLOW is Elliott Jaques and his contention that people when matched well to their capability, doing work that is also matched to their capability...where rewards are commensurate, approach conditions of FLOW where they are enabled through the fit between who they are and what they do.

I couldn't find any quotes attributed to Jaques where he discussed FLOW specifically, but rather FLOW was the outcome from the practice of his principles of Requisite Organization.

“Leaders create an environment which everyone has the opportunity to do work which matches his potential capability and for which an equitable differential reward is provided.”  - Elliott Jaques

Jaques is well known, where he is known, for how to:

“how to design organizations – or systems of roles – whose nature is such that they can be occupied by people who are enabled to collaborate in pursuing the objectives for which the organization has been established, and which provides a setting for those people to be able to relate to each other with mutual trust, personal dignity, and the opportunity to continue their life long working-through of paranoid anxieties in constructive working rather than acting them out.”  Jaques, E. (1995).  Reply to Dr Gilles Amado.  Human Relations , 48(4), 359-366.

...and FLOW emerges from that.

Helpful Hint: The context of FLOW is a critical consideration because FLOW is an outcome, which emerges often with properties much different than those properties that constitute systems which are found in the structure of the systems underlying it's emergence.
Action Step: FLOW is emergent from living, working and relationships, and it is the design of the structure of those systems which is critical to construct, or notice, in the advent of inbornness and it's wired in Happiness, or Success and the requirements which are demanded for FLOW.  An exercise which can be context-setting for FLOW is to list those activities that meet Csikszentmihalyi and Jaques’ "criteria" for causing FLOW to emerge.

More Info @F-L-O-W

Disclaimer |  Terms Of Service |  Earnings Disclaimer |  Privacy Notice |  Contact Support |  Buy the Book