TPOVs @F-L-O-W

PAAR
 

PAAR is an acronym to help you remember that each problem, solution and design gap contains four components of Power, Accountability, Authority, and Responsibility. These components give us short-hand in a long-hand world of complexity, and allow us to quickly frame problems, solutions, and design gaps quickly and easily.

PAAR is actually a multi-layered, multi-dimensional model that allows us to short-hand complexity, and while not completely wholistic in practice, gives us a toolkit that allows us to understand Ready, Willing, Able and Fit.

Note the graphic here: http://www.leadu.com/PAAR

This four stage process using PAAR is a way in which to design scaffolding, usually through Role Design, and other less evasive methods, such as task assignment or facilitated problem solving, monitoring, coaching and even training to supplement and complement KSEs.

Almost all pof these categories of inquiry (at least those that i can think of) have a PAAR, which, using the golf metaphor, there is a set of success requirements that can be assigned for the problem to be solved, or leave unsolved, as often when we solve the wrong problem, a more complex problem emerges...we want to take care in just being problem solvers and not looking at down the road consequences.

Example:

I don't have electricity.

Getting electricity as a PAAR, in other words, there is power, literally and figuratively<no pun intended> and accountability, authority and responsibility all present in solving this problem. It has a PAAR, which when met, the lights come on.

Yet, even though we established a PAAR, there is a larger issue looming in the background, which is a new problem generated by the solution of the first.

What happens or what occurs when the lights come on, when you can plug in the fan, tv, refrigerator, or aircon?

Now, drop into Ready, Willing, Able and Fit?

While this is another dimension of creating FLOW, it's so central to FLOW.

In the example, do we create FLOW?

Not until we solve the downstream issues, assessing Ready, Willing, Able and Fit--> like who is going to pay the new bill, where does the money come from, what about all the appliances that suddently became eligible as a result of electricity, putting new pressure on the income?

You see the PAAR for the "getting electricity" is actually only part of a much larger "course" of action, and FLOW stems from downstreaming, not just problem-solving.

Helpful Hint: PAAR helps us quickly frame up 4 quick systems of aliveness (they each emerge from four directions) and like leggo blocks we can easily attach them to scaffold more complex situations to actually assess and identify design needs in the Ready, Willing, Able and Fit domains.

PAAR Four Directions ValuSync Motivation

Power Against Do Power

Accountability Away From Become Avoidance

Authority Towards Have Achievement

Responsibility With Be Affiliation

Action Step: At first it is difficult to get your arms around this way of working towards FLOW because it is a metasystem, which means it uses a systems of systems approach to modeling, but over time, one becomes more familiar with each part of the modeling process and sees that each system used can be combined with other systems for greater sensemaking, as well as a method to contextualize the underlying elements in problems, solutions and design gaps, which are upstream of their resultants, artifacts and downstream consequences, or problems of problems, which are present in complex situations.

More Info @F-L-O-W

Disclaimer |  Terms Of Service |  Earnings Disclaimer |  Privacy Notice |  Contact Support |  Buy the Book