TPOVs @F-L-O-W

One Minus Five Percent
 

You will hear me mention 1-5% in reference to the number of people who with some significant probability align with a particular success model.

The reason I adopted this particular "reference point" was to describe a "probability”. In quantum mechanics, which I claim to know nothing about, there is an idea that something can be a wave or a particle and that there is a probability of it being so.

In my ideas about discussing discrete notions (oxymoron! --> me)...

I look at how to get the most for the least, because getting more costs too much.  In some cases, precision is needed and one would need higher probabilities.  

For the figurative language I use to get people to dialogue and inquire about reality, the probability that 1-5% of the people "probably" describes a way to look at the differences in people. 

The similarities in the ideas that any given set of success requirements will naturally match 1-5% of those people with the natural happiness profile that either closely or probably matches.

I think this is important to illustrate the tendency of BS to say, IF I CAN DO IT, SO CAN YOU.

This is a particularly important axiom for BS, as all of us want to teach our model of reality to everyone else. In all likelihood, exemplars of this 1-5% are monetizing this alignment. Because this alignment is natural in most cases, it is NOT transferrable to those who are not aligned with this particular set of requirements.

It's the same issue with change, IMHO.

People want others to change and they show them how they have done it, and expect others to be able to follow them, or it.

Helpful Hint: What is key in my experience is to know yourself well enough to choose a set of success requirements that is as close to your natural strengths and happiness profile as possible. This actually requires little change personally, although we all do, OVERTIME.

Usually this is along a change trajectory of our own happiness profile, which encapsulates our strengths profile, because what gets rewarded, gets grooved, and what wants to get rewarded is wired into our natural filters.

Action Step: There are probably about 20-100 meta models of success around the world, where being, doing, having and becoming is aligned with a particular set of meta requirements. Then of course there are millions of phenotypes that spin off from these essentials. Try this: Identify a set of requirements, which to you seem natural for success. Then compare that to the model that has chosen you and talk to someone you know about the gaps present.  

More Info @F-L-O-W

Disclaimer |  Terms Of Service |  Earnings Disclaimer |  Privacy Notice |  Contact Support |  Buy the Book