|
In search of the Master Code, the
ultimate system of identifying whether or not we can
recognize and regulate capability becomes more complex by
the day, and is the most difficult to conceptualize set of
ideas on my mind in 2012, yet, like Prince... I wrote this when
I was dreaming... So, it's a first draft.
Like an "equalizer" with slide
switches: Multi-Faceted CAPABILITY (MFC) is emergent
from:
Values
Intelligence (g)
Ego Complexity
Task Performance
Social Perspective
Processing Complexity (Languaging)
Personality Dynamics
Accumulated Knowledge, Skill & Experience (KSE)
Leadership Decision-Making Level
Resultants (Realtime) &
Artifacts
Cultural Scaffolding
Quick link to
Job Fit, as it contains a simpler
version.
ASSUMPTIONS:
1. There are levels of complexity which can be identified
holographically in the components as well as the whole of the
known.
2. It may be important to have some knowledge of what level is
operative in a range of
being, doing, having and becoming,
or not.
3. People demonstrate MFC across a range of activity, but more
than likely have a home which may describe them well and be
predictive of a majority of their intent.
4. Attention often is driven by the emergence of observed
effects and the efficacy of intent.
5. MFC is largely created through a combinatorial effect
influenced significantly by inbornness.
6. Observations of behavior and the resultants in realtime, as
well as artifacts that remain overtime are key determinants of
Assessed MFC.
7. MFC is more than likely to change overtime due to the
maturation of the components.
8. Capability must always be associated with a role? Or
domain?
9. Developmental Density is the degree of robustness
resulting in adaptive resilience and may or may not be related
to frequency?
10. Frequency of behavior is related to the emergence of
success in the system.
|
