TPOVs @F-L-O-W

METAIDEA
 

Risks to Consider: There is a classic saying on the Street: "Don't fight the Fed." The Fed is the single most powerful financial institution in the world and remains fully committed to keeping rates down. Although the United States is in horrible financial condition, the market still views Treasury bonds as a safe haven, which could send prices higher if another financial crisis hits the Street.

Action to Take:  Despite the country's battered financial condition, Treasury bonds are still viewed as one of the safest securities in the world. But with a terrible risk-reward ratio, growing fiscal deficits, record-low yields and attractive alternatives, the Treasury market is ripe for a long overdue correction. That's why it is time for forward-thinking investors to sell their Treasury bonds and protect their portfolios from huge losses.

http://t.money.msn.com/top-stocks/bubble-bigger-than-housing-about-to-pop

This article reminded me of a metaidea (sounds like some kind of bug when you pronounce it ma ta dea)...

And it might be...hehe

The recommendation to get out of treasuries takes on a very similar thread @F-L-O-W and asking people to swap needs and wants, to get out @BS...

IF EVERYONE DID IT, the cure is worse than the disease, it would crater the system...

So, as a pattern watcher-applications person, I wonder if this metaidea was worth "categorizing" in some form, because it might have implications we could use in design?

If something is recommended that if everyone did it, doing it would be worse than not doing it, then is there built in resistance to any action by the masses unless forced?

In other words, is this something we could say, it won't happen and when it does, there are worse things.

Example:

People say, you have to own gold for various reasons.

I've been against this for the everyday person, other than as a novelty, and something to enjoy, jewelry is a better investment in my view, because you can wear it instead of keep it hidden in your wall, or with someone else in a vault somewhere.

Reason:

When the time comes that we need gold for day to day currency, things are going to be so bad anyway, that while gold will be nice, holding onto it and your life will probably be a greater concern.

The same with the day that everyone runs from Treasuries

My thinking was this:

If the time comes that Treasuries are no longer worth anything, then what will be happening in the world?

What other currency can possibly handle what the dollar does?

You have circulation issues (amount in circulation).

You have distribution issues (amount moving around).

You have acceptance issues (who will accept a basket of currencies and what will it be backed by?)

You have storage issues (you can see that now, gold is hard to move, it's heavy and you can't carry it around without someone noticing).

You have control "authority" issues, who will be the authority behind it and who will control it?

We can't even get along with anything in the world really, will the G7, 8, 20, 100 be involved?

China can't handle it, as many think china is creating a gold-backed currency, but who will accept that at McDonald's or your bank, and believe me, China has it's own SUPER BIG problems too, as does Russia, as does the Euro, and everyone else should the treasuries enter a period where there is a "run" away anything?

Russia is not in debt (as is China), everyone else is, but if the Treasuries go, the world grinds to a halt, and Russia can't feed itself because you can eat oil and gas...per se...nor can you eat gold? Most people don't realize Russia has no market economy, it's a commodities economy, and therefore depends almost wholesales, as does the middle east on the fate of commodities
Helpful Hint: My Metaidea is that in order to ascertain whether something makes enough sense to incorporate it into your action plan is to consider the metaidea and to think through the process of whether or not, if someone/everyone did x, y or z, what would be the ramifications in the system and how long would it take to solve the issues. In the above examples about gold and money, even treasuries @F-L-O-W, the action is impractical at this time, which means the system has it's own resistance and while a storm of sorts  could really screw things up for a time, an equilibriation would re-occur to restablish order, we would not have a paradigmatic shift per se, as most are calling for, such as gold becomes the currency, a china-backed gold standard would emerge (right away), or anything else.
Action Step:

When someone makes a predication or a recommendation, consider the metaidea parameters:

1) how big could it get before resistance brought it back to equilibrium?

2) what are the chances EVERYONE would do it?

3) if people did do it, what are the likely replacements, supplements, or actions that are going to be present, and are those worse than the disease?
Comments:

More Info @F-L-O-W

Disclaimer |  Terms Of Service |  Earnings Disclaimer |  Privacy Notice |  Contact Support |  Buy the Book