TPOVs @F-L-O-W

Epigenetic 5 or e5

 

The e5 is poorly named, so I am looking for a better name, if you have one let me know.

First off, the e5 is 6c's, maybe I should call it that?

Content

Context

Conditions

Code

Culture

Core

These represent the following in what I would refer to as a Meaning Making Architecture, Methodology, or perhaps even Sense Making per se.

Content is the actual objective representation of whatever it is, words, behavior, whatever the object is that you are referring to point at was present, or observed, or the anchor to what it is you are making meaning about.

Context is the location, you might say, of the object or content.  Without all contexts coming with content, and all content coming with context, it's very difficult to make meaning.

You could say "chair" and that is content, but the context is being invented, or hallucinated, whatever the case might be, with just "chair".  For context, you might see a person point and say "chair" and then you have observed content and context.  You still don't have enough to make much verifiable data, which is the key to using the LADDER OF INFERENCE in meaning making observations.

Conditions are those "requirements" that exist as the direction of the goal.  For instance, I could say “Move that chair over there.” perhaps adding non-verbal’s, such as pointing or gesturing, both of which are a part of content and context.

In Japan, I might bow, or in India, I might clasp my hands together like praying or as in greeting "Namaste" which might be like asking please, or saying it with respect.  I think you get my meaning here--the conditions are --> to teach you about the e5, as an example.

Conditions are critical because they dictate many things, including all the requirements for satisfying, or exceeding expectations.  Requirements as conditions, you might say, are intentional expectations, because they are not always met.

Code represents the algorithm, or even heuristics (in management), or "ways of doing things" that replicate.  For instance, in our house, we always had noodle soup and butterballs for holiday meals.  That was the code that we learned.  Sometimes, I see my children ask for it when we are together for a holiday, because the holiday eating algorithm is "noodle soup and butterballs" like grandma used to make, right?

Life is full of code, full of algorithms that have already been used to solve problems that are often related to conditions, or the "conditional" environment.  In some ways, they become the "sticky resultants" or the "way" things are done around here.

Culture is actually a collection of code...a system of problem solving that is passed on from parent to child, from peer to peer, from artifacts to people, as they read the signs of those who previously solved problems.  Culture is actually the written and unwritten scaffolding for behavior.

Core is referring to the "epigenetic" nature of the genetic/mimetic environment.  For instance, we know that DNA can be switched on and off and can be influenced by words, sounds, and language.  The core is in flux, albeit less much so than all of the rest of the "5".  In the graph attached, you can see the shifting slope of change in the e5 depicted in relationship to complexity.

Helpful Hint: The reason this is ultra-critical is that the CHANGE PEOPLE think "whatever they do and whenever they do it”, can change these systems.  Like geology, over time, they can, and do change, in large part; not as a result of intervention, but as a result of maturation, over time.

Like geology, it can shift dramatically, and is changeable, but ordinarily not without significant events that alter everything else too.  Surgical change, like so many people portend in their change-of-the-day methods, are not like learning per se. This gradually chips away or adds to the density of our meaning making.  It is not often effectual at all in shifting meaning making in time, because of the sunk costs that we have resulting from experience.

Any learning model, or change model would be informed by the MetaSystem of change and its roots and likely fruits if it were to be a model that is going to be worth investing in over time.

Action Step: Read this quote from Wil Durant and see if you can see the richness of meaning making and watch the e5 dance:

"Hence a certain tension between religion and society marks the higher stages of every civilization.  Religion begins by offering magical aid to harassed and bewildered men; it culminates by giving to a people that unity of morals and belief which seems so favorable to statesmanship and art; it ends by fighting suicidally in the lost cause of the past.

For as knowledge grows or alters continually, it clashes with mythology and theology, which change with geological leisureliness.  Priestly control of arts and letters is then felt as a galling shackle or hateful barrier, and intellectual history takes on the character of a "conflict between science and religion”.

Institutions which were at first in the hands of the clergy, like law and punishment, education and morals, marriage and divorce, tend to escape from ecclesiastical control, and become secular, perhaps profane.

The intellectual classes abandon the ancient theology and—after some hesitation—the moral code allied with it; literature and philosophy become anticlerical.

The movement of liberation rises to an exuberant worship of reason, and falls to a paralyzing disillusionment with every dogma and every idea.  Conduct, deprived of its religious supports, deteriorates into epicurean chaos; and life itself, shorn of consoling faith, becomes a burden alike to conscious poverty and to weary wealth.

In the end, a society and its religion tend to fall together, like body and soul, in a harmonious death.  Meanwhile among the oppressed another myth arises, gives new form to human hope, new courage to human effort, and after centuries of chaos builds another civilization."[9]


More Info @F-L-O-W

Disclaimer |  Terms Of Service |  Earnings Disclaimer |  Privacy Notice |  Contact Support |  Buy the Book