"This isn't to romanticize "do what you love," but thanks to a
wise counselor, I did that very thing.
I was advised, based on my stated interests, to become a
chemical engineer."
http://m.asia.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304256404579451391700824368
When I saw this article listed, I had a reaction..."be careful
doing what you love"...only about 1-5% will be coherent enough
to make that work...the key point is the second point in the
quote:
"I was advised, based on my stated interests..."
The position @F... Is to identify this inborn motives which
will "force" service over time in means to satisfy them--to
build more dense and frequent means--as YOU emerges.
MOST don't know truly what they love because it's all
entangled in BS and where they are at the time.
Becoming a chemical engineer was a way for this person to
satisfy their inbornness, yet the BS surrounding money as told
later in the quip may not have been important to him but more
important to someone else--making them "move" from career to
career...
SO much of the explanations are a mashup in transition of the
underlying operating system @BS...
Helpful Hint: I think this is an important
thing to recognize as you sort through an understanding of
assumptions in core operating systems.
Action Step: sort the rhetoric for BS @F...
By noting if the core elements of one system or another are
driving the rationale.
Example:
Inherent in this example is the idea of "do what you love...I
did and it's works!"
Yet, it's so much BS because this person happened to be a
1-5%er whose karma magically fell in place...seemingly
contrasted by the person who went from engineering to law
chasing money..
More than likely they are no worse for the wear in both cases
as each is right and each was wrong in some ways, one
"thinking" that doing what they loved worked for them and
could work for u...and the other shifting means....having got
it "wrong" on the first go...each with different reasons for
being.
|
© Generati |
|
