|
In another TPOV, I discussed
CORPORATE, as well as pointed out there were three other
MetaSystems running that could explain a lot of our
behavior, individually as well as collectively.
Over time, people have asked me to
make those simpler and easier to understand and a few years
ago, I came up with the idea that led to Being, Doing, Having,
and Becoming. They themselves are powerful MetaSystems,
and seemingly within the grasp of most understanding because
people can identify with them.
In this comparison below, I show
you the relationships BDHB have with the Gravesian/SDi System,
and the Social Motives of McClelland:
BE -
Affiliation - Sacrifice of Self to Get Now
DO - Power -
Express Self Calculatedly
HAVE -
Achievement - Express Self, Respect Others
BECOME -
Avoidance - Sacrifice of Self to Get Later
These relationships are critically
interdependent and can explain each other to a large degree,
and remain able to explain nuances that are uniquely
describable by understanding the directional vector, the
density, scaffolding, and culture in which they replicate.
|
