|
The problem we have today could be eliminated if the debate
was changed.
We are trying to solve the wrong problem.
We are trying to solve a problem which exists only as an
illusion of a fading legacy of
BS.
"You cannot balance the budget without raising revenue and
cutting expenses."
MAYOR MICHAEL R. BLOOMBERG,
weighing in on the presidential race by finding fault with
both candidates.
I wanted to put this into a TPOV because it's critical to our
thinking long term.
It is not necessary to have a balanced budget. HOWEVER, it's
also to important to look at what we have done with money and
credit over the past 50 years, and we have clearly allowed the
BS-machine, including that which is government to grow
completely out of whack.
You might remember me writing, that what we could do, is bond
out 15 trillion against our hard assets (we have about 300
trillion), make them 50 year bonds, and get people to buy
small ones, like war bonds, so everyone felt it was part of
their obligation, including their retirement programs, etc.
and such, there are 300 million of us, and that is 50,000 a
piece, if we involve the rest of the world, 5,000 could be
taken out of our taxes on a pay plan for those in the usa and
the others could buy them, especially central banks as our
assets secure them, we make them asset bonds.
Ok, that solves raising the cash, then we use that to re-make
government into a civilary (a broad-based, full spectrum
military-structure-like-RO) which would be designed to perform
hyper-human skills all around the world.
This would put a lot of people to work, who won't have gainful
employment, including those who are retiring and
can't/shouldn't @F-L-O-W.
This would increase revenue significantly, more than likely a
trillion dollars a year, as civilary could be a trillion
dollar business, like insurance, healthcare, and other
trillion dollar businesses.
Our problem is that we have run out of ideas in
BS, and that
we need to look beyond our current issues, and re-construct
our economy on a different set of criteria, one being a
psuedo-governing body that was built entirely upon RO @F-L-O-W
and the budget would begin to rebalance itself, as we phased
out current legacy government systems, that would be put on
some kind of obsolescence timeline.
We would need to end certain kinds of freedom, everyone would
have to participate in some way in the civilary, or buy
themselves out by contributions.
I realize this is missing a lot of detail, but reframing how
the world is, and showing that we are going to transform to
another level of consciousness @F-L-O-W is key to creating the
scaffolding.
The 15 trillion would buy us time, as long as we get rid of
the graft that we have now, and start realizing that we have
to stop doing what we are doing, in the way we are doing, or
we are all going to pay bigtime.
|
