TPOVs @F-L-O-W

Attribution
 

The story of attribution begins with Hamlet?
 

Hamlet:
What have you, my good friends, deserv'd at the hands of
Fortune, that she sends you to prison hither?

Guildenstern:
Prison, my lord?

Hamlet:
Denmark's a prison.

Rosencrantz:
Then is the world one.

Hamlet:
A goodly one, in which there are many confines, wards, and
dungeons, Denmark being one o' th' worst.

Rosencrantz:
We think not so, my lord.

Hamlet:
Why then 'tis none to you; for there is nothing either good or
bad, but thinking makes it so. To me it is a prison.

Hamlet Act 2, scene 2, 239–251

 
PEOPLE ATTRIBUTE MEANING to actions by others using their own lens...Take this quote from:
Kindness. It's Sexy, Righteous & Powerful. Is it a part of your strategy?

"By contrast, I met others who stayed busy checking their cell phones or looking around the room as they feigned conversation. One, the manager of a well-known show host, even sneered at my offer to send him my novel,Heaven, for a possible interview."

ALL of us see the world through our own lens... There is no other way to look.

In doing that, our filters "attribute" (we have too for many reasons) meaning.

So, all the meaning we make is LOADED with our attributions.

MOST OF WHICH, at best, is slanted, at worst, just plain wrong.

The attribution however has one more element...a "self-hugging" element.

This emeges from ego complexity and is designed (naturally) to "protect" the natural inborn system--NOT BAD!

In so doing, this ego complex using the inborn filters, categorizes meaning very quickly, dumps it into hoppers, that get created through this same mechanism on the fly, and over time, based on "attributions" we make to what we perceive.

This is critical to understand.

In the quote, the person assumes that those folks doing stuff "outside" their "category of:

"... Peace, patience, love, joy, truth, kindness, gratitude, forgiveness, generosity, trust, faithfulness, self-control...are sexy, righteous & powerful."

When i look at this person's "values attribution" which is emergent from their inborn filters/attribution system... It's easy to see why this person attributes meaning the way they do-->NOT WRONG!

BUT, while the story teller uses this to make his point, it's most likely entirely flawed.

I actually fit his description of the person's he called to account...i am NOT any of those things naturally in his values attribution, yet John attributed this to me?

Mike,

This blog post made me think of you. Even though you say you are not a warm fuzzy person you continually show kindness to people.

Both at home and abroad. You are what the author describes as power-full as opposed to powerful.

Enjoy and embrace,

John

While I do take this to "heart" from John, I am careful to take a perspective on his "attribution" and note that there are reasons that John made this, and those might not all be known from his remarks, but follow a context, which most of you would be missing. Thus you might believe John, or attribute meaning the way he does--AND THAT'S OK, I am flattered, but also take that with a grain of salt as well...because none of you, or anyone, knows the context which generates my behaviors.

I do believe that John and the author are correct, however in attributed higher levels of "power" to indirect and oblique "power-ful" behavior and for me, that is important, as it provides me with validation of my own attribution which is similar, in order to get to the "next" level of power, one must give it away.

Helpful Hint: My hope was in illustrating through these examples that the central idea of "attribution" and how it happens naturally, as well as downstream in our persective taking of perspective has been helpful. The ability to take a perspective on our attribution, even after the fact is another way to release the subjective hold that nature has on our (elements ofexperiential learning theory, fyi)  perception, artifacts (symbols), behavior and affection...and while objectification may not shift these cadre of emerging elements, or should it, the ideas that might emerge, desensitize us to the irrational dance of the elephant...and may give us more "power" or peace.
Action Step: 

 I am reminded of a Dan Ariely - Leaf Van Boven Interview called "Election Outrage" http://itunes.apple.com/us/itunes-u/arming-the-donkeys/id420535283, where Boven says..."they don't want us happy...if we are happy, we are complacent" (paraphrased)... I want you to think about this...and attribution. If scaffolding ourselves and others with "attribution" nd the perspectives of attribution, we automatically desensitize ourselves to polarity... At the ebb... Polarizing, as did the author, to make his point (or live his life) through his attribution.

What is the state of your attribution?

What must you do to scaffold yourself, knowing you attribute meaning naturally?


More Info @F-L-O-W

Disclaimer |  Terms Of Service |  Earnings Disclaimer |  Privacy Notice |  Contact Support |  Buy the Book