|
"In complexity, asymmetry reins to
both confuse and explain what occurs when stratified
capability perceives....".
The problems, almost all we feel
today, stem from this one paradigmatic system... Asymmetry.
Complexity loves asymmetry.
Asymmetry is the unevenness in
everything from inbornness to success requirements, and
asymmetry provides the variety of figure: ground contexts that
can be attracted to a variety of worldviews.
On one level, things are great, on
another level, things are not great. Some people are so
good, some people not so good. In some places, things are
booming, in others, bust.
For those in
BS, asymmetry is
beyond them as they continue to attempt to squash layers of
capability and their interactions with complexity into
single-lens equality.
Take for instance, President Obama
in the 2012 State of the Union Speech:
"...we can restore an economy
where everyone gets a fair shot, everyone does their fair
share, and everyone plays by the same set of rules."
I could put a lot of words here,
and make this speech of his work, but it would change the
BS
intention here.
There is no respect for asymmetry
in
BS.
Differences abound.
You give me any set of rules, and
I'll show you how unfair they are to certain groups, no matter
what. The reason? Asymmetry. There is no one
standard set of rules, unless they are meta-rules. These
would require meta-systematic reasoning AND generation.
There was none of that which I could find in his remarks So I
can't assume he understands the meta-context that I could
configure his statement into. Even though I would like to
give him the benefit of the doubt, it's just
BS... And an
inappropriate fit for the change he claims to bring.
Why is it
BS, and symmetrical and
not FLOS-aspired and asymmetrical?
Because the BE system is governed
by
BS, as are all the current systems that are brightening
into this values light in FS=Green right now.
If people ARE different, then the
same set of rules won't work for everyone. Someone will
ALWAYS have an advantage, no matter what set of rules apply.
There is no even access, no fairness in any of this because
people are endowed by their creators with differing gifts.
The CURRENT set of rules and
regulation favors clearly some capabilities over others. It
will NEVER be different.
So, on one hand the President's
speech hopes to model a reduction in the distance between the
haves and have-not's. Rather, essentially, it secures the
future will be not only MORE of the same, but worse, by
failing to understand ASYMMETRY.
Actually, we need different sets of
rules for each level of the population and of course, this
won't fly at all in the face of the GREEN equality system,
which fights the pigeonholing of people As a result, it
pigeon-holes them!
This duality is what is going to
create the huge problems brought about by misunderstanding
Asymmetry.
|
